Kay Ryan's poetry is almost always very personal, written in a way that doesn't show it to be personal. Her poems are short, because her poems are not about discussion or pondering, they are about stating a feeling or point.
In her poetry itself, Ryan uses a lot of oxymorons, not only does it draw attention to an important line in her poetry, but it is also a great way for her to express her humor in her work. The way in which she writes her poetry is very specific, the syntax is choppy and the lines create awkward or unnatural breaks in a sentence. This is deliberate and contrasts with the lines that rhyme in order to keep the reader alert.
Kay Ryan also uses a lot of imagery and symbolism, often related to birds. For example, the imagery of birds is forefront in her poems: Home to Roost, Felix Crow, Flamingo Watching, Soft, Paired Things, and most likely in others that I have yet to read.
Her poems are often simple in meaning on the surface, but with a deeper meaning the more you read. The issues and feelings she writes about are very common, but not easily explained, the issues have long been around, yet not easily solved. In my opinion, she writes these poems because the feelings and issues within are the ones that are most important to her, and she wants other people to see it as well.
One thing to note when reading her poems is that her diction is very simple, with the exception of a few complicated words. These words must not be overlooked, for their meaning is important.
Overall, Ryan's poetry is deeply personal, with a sophisticated simplicity that draws in the reader. The issues are ones we all know and the feelings are all ones we have experienced to some degree, and this allows anyone who reads her work to connect with it in their own way, creating deeply personal poems for all to enjoy.
Alex's pool
Monday, April 25, 2011
Sunday, April 24, 2011
The Poet's View - Kay Ryan
Please go to this website to view Kay Ryan speaking about some of her work. For some reason, I can't make the insert a Link work.... so, my bad, just bear with it.
Please copy and paste this into your browser: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFCP5dCfynI
Please copy and paste this into your browser: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFCP5dCfynI
Robert Frost and his Influences on Kay Ryan
Robert Frost, born in San Francisco in 1874 was an inspiration for Ryan Kay. Contrary to Kay, he spent his childhood in Lawrence, Massachusetts and was greatly influenced by the nature and beauty of the east coast. In 1895 he married Elinor White. The couple moved to England after their farm in New Hampshire had failed. There her was influenced by Edward Thomas, Rupert Brooke, and Robert Graves. He also met Ezra Pound who promoted and published his work. His first two publications were A Boy's Will and North of Boston. By the time he returned to America in 1915, he had garnered the respect of a nation. His poetry was what Ryan Kay grew up reading, and his style and tone has a clear resemblance to Kay's poetry.
October by Robert Frost
O hushed October morning mild,
Thy leaves have ripened to the fall;
To-morrow's wind, if it be wild,
Should waste them all.
The crows above the forest call;
To-morrow they may form and go.
O hushed October morning mild,
Begin the hours of this day slow,
Make the day seem to us less brief.
Hearts not averse to being beguiled,
Beguile us in the way you know;
Release one leaf at break of day;
At noon release another leaf;
One from our trees, one far away;
Retard the sun with gentle mist;
Enchant the land with amethyst.
Slow, slow!
For the grapes' sake, if they were all,
Whose leaves already are burnt with frost,
Whose clustered fruit must else be lost—
For the grapes' sake along the wall.
This poem clearly demonstrates Frost's use of imagery and nature above all else. This is slightly different from Kay's poetry in that is very detail specific and is more wordy. The most significant difference is his overt love of nature, and it is routinely the focus of his poems, rather than a means to explain or express a point.
The same can be said for this next poem, a personal favorite of mine as it is.
Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening by Robert Frost
Whose woods these are I think I know.
His house is in the village though;
He will not see me stopping here
To watch his woods fill up with snow.
My little horse must think it queer
To stop without a farmhouse near
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year.
He gives his harness bells a shake
To ask if there is some mistake.
The only other sound's the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.
The woods are lovely, dark, and deep.
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.
A key similarity between Frost's poetry and that of Ryan's is that neither of them really ever express a point in their poems, even if there is one. The reader must infer and look closely to grasp the meaning and to understand the poet's intent, but their poems also leave room for the reader to turn the meaning into something all their own.
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Sharks' Teeth by Kay Ryan
Everything contains some
silence. Noise gets
its zest from the
small shark's-tooth
shaped fragments
of rest angled
in it. An hour
of city holds maybe
a minute of these
remnants of a time
when silence reigned
compact and dangerous
as a shark. Sometimes
a bit of a tail
or a fin can still
be sensed in parks.
silence. Noise gets
its zest from the
small shark's-tooth
shaped fragments
of rest angled
in it. An hour
of city holds maybe
a minute of these
remnants of a time
when silence reigned
compact and dangerous
as a shark. Sometimes
a bit of a tail
or a fin can still
be sensed in parks.
Analysis
Unlike some of Ryan's other poems, this one starts quite suddenly, with the first line setting the tone for the whole poem. “Everything contains some silence” is a proposition the speaker immediately challenges and resolves. How does “noise” contain silence? The rest of the first stanza answers this question by arguing that the "rest" in noise is what gives it its "zest", being the nature of music: restful, but full of life. Ryan describes the "rest" as "shark-tooth shaped fragments": each "rest" in music is a sudden ascent followed by a sudden descent, with an edge. Just like a shark's tooth.
In the second stanza, Ryan shifts to "remnants of a time" this is an important shift because "remnants" are not the same as "fragments" because "remnants" can be whole. However, a remnant has left us, it is a monument of the past that does not function in the present. Ryan calls these "remnants" "compact and dangerous as a shark" but this is misleading, it is not simply the "remnant" that is dangerous, but rather the time from which it came and the characteristics of that time that are the danger because they can sneak up on us and be as damaging as a shark is to us in the ocean if we are not alert and watchful. Ryan does not specify the time period she is addressing, she often leaves these details blank so that the reader may make the poem more personal by filling in the blank themselves. In the last few lines, Ryan tells us what to watch for, "a bit of tail" or a glimpse of "a fin". This tells us to look at history both far away - the tail (the end) and the more recent history - the fin (the middle). Finally, Ryan tells us where to be watchful, "sensed in parks". Parks are pubic and places for people to gather, and this is what we need to be watchful of.
Cut Out For It by Kay Ryan
Cut out
as a horse
is cut
from the
pack. Peeled
off, but
a long time
back. Now
such a feeling
for the way
they touch
and shift
as one, the
beauty when
they run.
as a horse
is cut
from the
pack. Peeled
off, but
a long time
back. Now
such a feeling
for the way
they touch
and shift
as one, the
beauty when
they run.
Analysis
The first stanza emphasizes the idea of separation from a natural form: "cut from the pack". The repetition of "cut" tells the reader that the separation was forced, and not a choice. The selection of horse is important, as it most likely deals with the domestication of animals.
The second stanza picks off from the first by reinforcing this unnatural separation by using the phrase "peeled off" as in, peeled off from the track. Ryan also tells us that this happened a "long time back", indicating that this separation might not even be remembered.
The third stanza is placed in the present, and shows a new bond, different from what nature had intended. The tone shifts here as well, in the first two stanzas the tone was somewhat regretful but reconciled to the facts of what had happened, but here the tone suggests a sense of awe. This is conveyed through the selected diction in the stanza, such as: "such a feeling"and "touch and shift as one". These lines suggest that the new partnership is that of horse and rider. The last three lines in this stanza is a rhyme. "As one, the beauty when they run". This ending seems to justify the domestication of horses, in honor of a new relationship and the word "beauty" suggest a form of harmony.
This poem speaks to the formation of a bond between man and horse, and Ryan shows her own personal feelings on the subject in the last rhyme of the poem. Kay Ryan used to ride horses as a child, it is very likely that she is writing this poem in response to memories of riding horses in her youth.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Atlas by Kay Ryan
Extreme exertion
isolates a person
from help,
discovered Atlas.
Once a certain
shoulder-to-burden
ratio collapses,
there is so little
others can do:
they can't
lend a hand
with Brazil
and not stand
on Peru.
isolates a person
from help,
discovered Atlas.
Once a certain
shoulder-to-burden
ratio collapses,
there is so little
others can do:
they can't
lend a hand
with Brazil
and not stand
on Peru.
Analysis
The first stanza centers around the use of an allusion to greek mythology. Atlas bears the world on his shoulders. He is the titan who supports the heavens.
This "extreme exertion" is so monumental, that others can't help when the "shoulder-to-burden ratio" is overcome. Once the system of aid collapses, people "can't lend a hand". By specifically mentioning Brazil and Peru in the second stanza, it can be assumed that Ryan is talking about foreign aid and how it is often a failure because we only step in after the "ratio collapses".
The message is clear, to avoid isolation and a collapse of what a country can support, people must intervene before it is too late to help, before we have to stand on Peru to help Brazil.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Paired Things by Kay Ryan
Who, who had only seen wings,
could extrapolate the
skinny sticks of things
birds use for land,
the backward way they bend,
the silly way they stand?
And who, only studying
birdtracks in the sand,
could think those little forks
had decamped on the wind?
So many paired things seem odd.
Who ever would have dreamed
the broad winged raven of despair
would quit the air and go
bandylegged upon the ground,
a common crow?
could extrapolate the
skinny sticks of things
birds use for land,
the backward way they bend,
the silly way they stand?
And who, only studying
birdtracks in the sand,
could think those little forks
had decamped on the wind?
So many paired things seem odd.
Who ever would have dreamed
the broad winged raven of despair
would quit the air and go
bandylegged upon the ground,
a common crow?
Analysis
Rhyme is the primary device in the poem, it keeps a steady flow and accentuates the message well.
The first stanza is about the kind of people that are fliers. This could represent anything, such as, positivity, an open mind, dreamers, ect. By saying "who had only seen wings" the speaker isolates this group into the first stanza. The repetition of who is important because it tells the reader that the question is a true question. The choice of diction by saying "skinny sticks of things" and "backward way they bend" emphasizes who foreign the idea of the ground is to the subject in stanza one.
The second stanza, in contrast, is about the type of people who are grounded. By saying "who only studying birdtracks" tells us that this group focuses on the ground. To this group, the idea of flight is bizarre, "little forks decamped on the wind".
Despite the differences of wings and legs, they pair perfectly in birds. The line between the third and fourth stanza hints at the meaning of the poem: "so many paired things seem odd."
The fourth stanza is interesting because the crow is family of birds, which ravens belong to, hence, all ravens are crows. The separation between the "raven of despair" in the air, from the "common crow" on the ground signals that too much of either group is bad. The selected diction to show this is complex: skinny sticks, little forks, despair, common. Each has a negative reinforcement, but if we combine groups, which we do so rarely, it will be odd, but positive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)